Manila Set the Bar Low But Did Visayas Even Clear It?
- Broni Slawa

- 2 days ago
- 3 min read

After the fallout of Musclecontest Philippines 2025 in Manila, the bodybuilding community approached Musclecontest Visayas 2026 with cautious optimism. Athletes, coaches, and supporters were watching closely — not just to compete, but to see whether meaningful changes had actually been made.
With just 21 athletes in total, this was undeniably a much smaller show. There were no Bodybuilding or Figure competitors, only one athlete in Men’s Classic Physique and Fit Model, two in Wellness, five in Bikini, and Men’s Physique as the largest division. For a brand like Musclecontest, those numbers raise questions about reach, promotion, and positioning.
But one thing needs to be made clear: that is not on the athletes.
Regardless of lineup size, competitors showed up. They committed to months of preparation. Strict dieting, disciplined training, managing stress, and sacrificing daily comforts, all for a moment on stage. Athletes don’t know how many they’re competing against until they’re backstage, sometimes not even until they’re lined up. Whether it’s one competitor or twenty, they did their job. They earned that stage.
What stood out most from this event was the effort coming from the Iloilo team. There was visible intent to improve. Compared to previous shows, tanning was better, the overall flow felt more controlled, and there was a noticeable level of care given to the athletes. Credit where credit is due. The Iloilo team showed heart, and it didn’t go unnoticed.
At the same time, improvement doesn’t mean the conversation stops. It simply shifts.
If tanning has improved, why are athletes still suggesting basic upgrades like proper exhaust systems and better ventilation? Why are questions still being raised about the use of higher-quality tanning products? These aren’t luxury requests. They’re baseline standards for a competitive bodybuilding environment.
If there was one element that truly anchored the event, it was the judging panel. Judges like Gain, Wils, and Yungyu didn’t just evaluate physiques, they supported the athletes. They brought professionalism, encouragement, and stability to a show that still had visible gaps. Several athletes noted how the judges made an effort to engage, uplift, and maintain a positive environment backstage and on stage.
And that brings up a difficult but necessary question: why are judges the ones stabilizing the event, instead of the organizers?
Presentation is another area that deserves attention. While athletes don’t compete for trophies, the overall presentation of a show reflects the respect given to them. Plastic trophies and medals, paired with a finish that felt underwhelming for a branded international event, didn’t align with the level of effort athletes brought to the stage. When someone gives months of their life to prep, every detail of the event should reflect that investment.
There was also a noticeable contrast in energy between the teams involved. The Iloilo Gold’s Gym team showed drive, presence, and commitment throughout the event. On the other hand, the Manila Musclecontest team felt less engaged, distant, and at times very disconnected from what was happening on the ground. In a sport where execution matters, that difference in energy is very much felt.
Despite everything, the event still drew international athletes from Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia, Myanmar, and the Philippines. That’s significant. It shows that the Philippines remains a destination competitors are willing to travel to. But that also raises the stakes — because every event becomes a reflection of the country’s standards.
This wasn’t a disaster. But it also wasn’t the standard the sport deserves.
It was something in between. A step forward, but not yet a solution.
And maybe that’s where the real conversation begins. Because the question is no longer whether things were better. The question is whether they are good enough.
From a PrepLife perspective, one thing is clear: the Iloilo team has the drive, and they have the heart. That much was proven. Which leads to a bigger question moving forward -- who should be leading these events? Because when passion is evident in one group and lacking in another, the direction forward becomes hard to ignore.
At the end of the day, the athletes did their job. The judges did theirs. Parts of the organizing team stepped up. But until the standard becomes consistent across the board, IFBB in the Philippines, particularly within Musclecontest events, remains stuck between what it could be and what it continues to settle for.
If Philippine bodybuilding truly wants to grow, then every show needs to stop asking, “Did we get through it?” and start asking, “Did we deliver what the athletes actually deserve?”




Comments